North Carolina Homeowners Sued Unison Over Equity Deals
A new class action lawsuit challenges the marketing and fees associated with shared appreciation agreements.
Updated on Sept. 23, 2026 in Residential
Live Poll
Do you trust home equity investment firms to offer fair terms to homeowners?
Five North Carolina plaintiffs have filed a federal class action lawsuit alleging that Unison shared appreciation agreements are deceptively marketed. The suit claims these contracts function as high-cost loans rather than true equity investments for homeowners.
Why it matters
The legal action highlights potential financial risks for residents using equity-sharing products, where origination fees and future repayment requirements may significantly exceed initial cash payouts. Plaintiffs argue that specific contract terms could lead to unexpectedly high costs over the long term.
The lawsuit alleges that Unison charges origination fees exceeding 5% of the initial payment amount. While Unison reports partnering with 17,000 homeowners nationwide on $8.8 billion in property, the North Carolina filing claims hundreds of local residents could be affected.
The players
Unison
An investment firm specializing in shared appreciation agreements for residential property owners.
Hometap
A competitor in the home equity investment market that is also facing litigation regarding lending disclosures.
The details
Unison provides homeowners an upfront lump sum in exchange for a future share of the property's appreciation. The lawsuit contends that the company uses specific appraisal vendors to potentially minimize home valuations, thereby maximizing the company's future returns upon the sale, death, or default of the homeowner. Plaintiffs further allege that the complex structure of these agreements obscures their true nature as high-cost debt.
Timeline
The lawsuit against Unison was filed in North Carolina federal court during the week of September 14, 2026.
A separate class action lawsuit against Unison was initiated in Colorado in the spring of 2026.
The Home Front
This litigation signals growing regulatory and legal scrutiny toward alternative home-equity financing models. It follows a pattern set by ongoing challenges to similar financial products under established consumer protection laws like the Truth in Lending Act.
Homeowners currently engaged in or considering equity-sharing agreements should carefully review the fine print regarding origination fees and the specific triggers for repayment, such as the sale or death of the homeowner. If you have questions about your specific contract, consult a licensed attorney or a financial advisor to understand the long-term impact on your property title.
The takeaway
These lawsuits underscore the importance of auditing the total cost of any equity-based funding product before signing. Residents should keep a detailed file of their initial agreement and any correspondence with the investment company to track potential changes in their equity stake over the contract term.
Further reading
Learn more about the implications of home equity agreements in the Residential section.
Live Poll
Do you trust home equity investment firms to offer fair terms to homeowners?
